Friday 28 August 2009

Broadband speeds, global test. It doesn't get any better for the UK

It is worth spending a little time on this site (if you are interested) just to see how other nations are performing in the broadband stakes. However, if you are a UK resident be prepared for more bad news...

Despite Europe having the highest average download speed of the 6 inhabited continents the UK is 40th in the table with an average of 5.10 MBit/s (that is actually higher than I would have expected but must be skewed by some of the inner city rates offered by BT & Virgin). In the upload stakes the UK is 61st (just 0.68 MBit/s).

That is dismal (although the US fares little better) but when married to the news I posted last night from the Heavy Reading report (that the UK is falling further behind in the NGA stakes) should give cause for very serious concern.

If we can't do it for ourselves at least do it for the next generation who will suffer even more than us. I need say no more.

Posted via web from Mark's posterous

Thursday 27 August 2009

Heavy Reading predicts gloomy outlook for UK

A recent report published by Heavy Reading entitled "FTTH Review & Five Year Forecast: The Road to Next-Gen PON" does indeed make heavy reading for us UK residents.

http://spedr.com/2dkz8

The report shows significant growth in FTTH connections globally with a predicted 129.2 million FTTH connected households on 2013 compared with 35.98 million in 2008.



In the Executive Summary the report concludes that "Mass-market FTTH is inevitable". Certainly good news for those of us extolling its virtues. However don't get too comfortable... in the UK we are potentially ten years behind other countries who have embraced the Fibre Generation and could fall even further behind.



As the above chart shows the UK is forecasted to remain the LAST of the major economies
in terms of total connected households and close to the bottom in terms of percentage penetration.

Frankly this is shameful. How can one of the leading economies not keep pace with development? How can we pour money into failed industries where many of the recipients are not even UK companies (I'm thinking of the motor industry) and fail so drastically to build an infrastructure that will allow us to remain a global economy of the future.

At this rate Britain will become a second world country within the next 10 years. Are you prepared to live with that? I'm not. Many others like me are unwilling to put up with this any longer and are looking to take control of their own broadband destinies. Many of these folks will be at the FTTH Colloquium and BSG COTS meeting in Hull next week. Register to attend, or follow the event online - details at www.fibrevolution.com

Work together to build The Fibre Generation.

Tuesday 25 August 2009

Ofcom survey shows we can't live without our Internet access

The following survey result is taken from the Ofcom front page: www.ofcom.org.uk

Ofcom asks
Which communication service could you not live without?
Internet (62.0%, 147 Votes)
Mobile phone (19.0%, 46 Votes)
Radio (15.0%, 35 Votes)
Digital TV (5.0%, 11 Votes)

Total Voters: 239

Not really a representative survey if you consider just 239 respondents all of whom had to be online to respond however perhaps this is a genuine indicator of the evolving public perception of the Internet from toy to tool, from useful to utility. This should also be something that those involved in delivering Digital Britain should take notice of.

They are alienating the public by focusing on illegal P2P file sharing. Not because we feel it should go unpunished (not all of us anyway!) but because it is getting far too much attention and focus from the powers that be who seem intent on digitally disabling a minority of transgressors some while failing to digitally enable those who really require it.

So come on Mr. Timms... let's refocus your attempts to drag this country into the new age of communications. Your first priority must be the infrastructure, after all, if that is failing, or in the worst cases does not exist at all, then the rest of your efforts are wasted. Work with us to help build the Fibre Generation!

Monday 24 August 2009

Driver for #FTTH: Hulu UK launch delayed until 2010 - Telegraph

Published: 6:02PM BST 24 Aug 2009

Hulu UK launch delayed until 2010: Hulu UK launch delayed until 2010
Hulu is a US-based web-TV service, which has been focussed on entering the UK market over the last six months.

Originally expected to launch by September 2009, by broadcasters and media agencies alike, the UK roll-out of the free web TV service backed by News Corp, NBC Universal and Disney, is not expected until the early part of 2010.

The Daily Telegraph understands that it is closest to signing a semi-exclusive deal with ITV, in exchange for equity in the company. However, it has yet to get any other content partners on board, despite nearly six months of discussions with BBC Worldwide, ITV and Channel 4, since the Competition Commission blocked Project Kangaroo, the three companies’ joint video-on-demand service in February 2009.

“Once ITV is on board, Hulu only needs one more UK broadcaster’s content for launch. It will probably go after a deal with BBC Worldwide, which is not signing exclusive arrangements with anyone and then secure some content from its parent companies. This will give it enough material to launch and probably take three to four months after its first deal with ITV.

“So you’re hopefully looking at a January 2010 launch,” said a source close to the US company.

Hulu, a free advertising-supported service, has also not yet rolled out its product to the major media agencies.

“We haven’t heard anything yet and we are one of the biggest groups responsible for planning and trading adverts in the digital space. To my knowledge Hulu has no presence in the marketplace or a dedicated UK sales team in place,” said Alex Randall, group trading director for Isobar, the digital arm of the Aegis group.

“It will need to present to the media agencies at least two months in advance of launch, in order to get on our clients’ schedules. Plus it may be a big success story in the US, but it’s not a working brand here and will need to sell hard,” he added.

Hulu was unavailable to comment.

Shame. This is a great service and a further key driver for higher broadband speeds. I hope we will see it alongside iPlayer and others in the near future.

Posted via web from Mark's posterous

Tuesday 18 August 2009

Get it done quick or the world will overtake you...

I love this movie - it has a great way of putting the fear of the future into a perspective that says, "If you start running now you might just keep up".

Run Forrest, Run!!!

Broadband Tax Dies on the Vine?

So news over the last few days that the so called Broadband Tax will be scrapped before it has even been implemented. This is the 50p per month on phones lines that would be charged as a levy to provide a stimulus to those areas who will not get adequate coverage from the new broadband offerings from the likes of BT & Virgin. More details are available here: http://bit.ly/Flvqh

Views on the tax have been divided from those utterly against paying any more tax to those wishing it could be levied on mobile phones as well to raise further funding for what is a highly costly issue. Personally I was OK with paying the tax as long as I would benefit from it. Of course, therein lies the problem. Unless I get off my ass and do something then there is litle chance for me to improve my own broadband connection or those in the community around me. There is no chance whatsoever of me seeing FTTC, let alone FTTH from either BT or Virgin, so JFDI is really my only option.

I have been exploring this for some time now and was good to go with an autumn push on the community, the councillors & the various other pieces of the machine however all of this was done on the assumption that while we would be able to raise some funding within the community as a co-operative group we would be able to tap into this broadband fund to deliver a large part of the investment needed.

But now, as the politicians worry about whether or not they will be elected in 9 months time, that option appears to have been removed. Which leaves a rather large void... OK, it may be possible to fill it within the community, it may be possible to get investment from other sources and I will certainly try these routes but the net result of this will be a further widening of the digital divide.

BT and Virgin will continue to serve the inner city areas where population densities are high enough to guarantee their return and the rural and semi-urban areas will continue to have to make do with whatever poor excuse for broadband is offered in their area.

Like the tax or not without it, or another means of capital injection, Digital Britain will fail.

Thursday 13 August 2009

Why FTTC is a step in the right direction

If you have any interest in broadband in Britain you will know that BT have announced they will deliver FTTC (Fibre to the Cabinet) rather than FTTP (Fibre to the Premises which includes FTTH - Fibre to the Home). They will start this roll out in 98 exchanges around the UK in the major metropolitan areas (see here for a map of the locations). No details are available about future exchanges that will be enabled with this but it is a sure bet that it will only cover those areas with a high population density. The technology is essentially to run fibre from the exchange to the street cabinets and to upgrade these cabinets to offer VDSL (Very High Speed DSL) to the customer using the existing copper lines. In fact it is very similar to the topology used by Virgin Media to deliver their high speed services, although those are also only available in urban areas.

So, what are your reactions to this? Are you happy that at least some of the country will be getting an improved broadband service (by improved I mean speed-wise, customer service is likely to be as bad as ever!)? Are you unhappy because you live in a rural area and will probably never benefit from BT's upgrades?

If you live outside of these locations (or those covered by Virgin) let me tell you why you should be pissed off. You will have to pay a levy on your phone line of 50p per month to support broadband projects in the UK and at this time you are almost certainly not going to benefit from that. Paying tax is one thing because at least you get tangible benefits from it (schools, health care, police, fire etc. etc.) but paying a 'tax' and receiving no benefit is wrong.

Now let me tell you why you should embrace FTTC and take advantage of the fund the levy will create. FTTC is a very useful interim step to the ultimate goal of FTTH - it will deliver much higher bandwidth (potentially 4 times although likely less as speed decreases the further you are from the cabinet) and at a fraction of the cost of FTTH. The implementation for FTTH is so costly to be almost prohibitive and the returns are over a long period of time (likely more than 15 years rather than the 3 to 5 that most investors will want to see) but FTTC can be implemented at a 1/3 to a 1/4 of the cost of FTTH while providing reusable infrastructure when the time is right to upgrade the ageing copper lines. FTTC can also be used in many rural or semi-rural areas (not all, of course but many can benefit from this). This has been proven by the work Rutland Telecom have done in Lymmington. These are also the kind of projects that the fund from the £6 levy has been set up to address and we are told by BIS (The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills who will administer the fund) that it will be available from early 2010.

So if, like me, you are in a rural area that will never see the benefits of the upgrades BT are doing and will never know the speeds Virgin Media can offer, FTTC brings a very useful and cost effective way forward. There is also no reason it could not be combined with wireless technology to reach those ultra rural areas or notspots.

By all means be critical of BT or Virgin Media but don't just sit and stew - there is a way forward you just need to get up & explore a little!

Posted via email from Mark's posterous

Saturday 8 August 2009

Either someone in Gov doesn't like Mr Timms or they don't care about #digitalbritain

Consider what we have learned: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8187884.stm

Mr. Timms will remain as financial secretary while picking up the remit for Digital Britain. Was he not busy enough trying to balance the countries books? How can one man take on such diverse and large remits?

If that were not enough there will be a general election looming within the next 10 months which leads me to question how any difference can be made to Digital Britain. I am afraid that all this tells me is that the government are not serious about Digital Britain. It is not that I believe Mr. Timms is the wrong person - he appears to have a better grounding in this area than most in Whitehall, however he is not being given any opportunity to make a difference.

The future of Digital Britain is in our hands. We cannot afford to rely on Government to make a difference - the digital future of this country is up to us.

That said... Good Luck, Mr. Timms!

Posted via email from Mark's posterous

Photos: BT FTTC Cabinets

via e.gg

If you wondered what they looked like here are some pics. Not sure what the fuss is about? Me too!

Posted via web from Mark's posterous

New Wi-Fi Standard Promises Blazing Fast Data Speeds | Gadget Lab

Excellent! No more worries about a bottleneck in the home... once you have FTTH, of course.

Posted via web from Mark's posterous

Friday 7 August 2009

The Pressure Fibre Brings to the Internet Exchanges

So this week I have been in Frankfurt hence my relative silence. I was there to see DE-CIX (they pronounce it dee kicks) or the German Internet Exchange - one of the three largest in Europe after Amsterdam (the largest) and London. You may not be aware of these groups. They are largely invisible to the Internet consumer but without their presence your connection into the world wide web would be impossible. Essentially they are the hub through which all Internet bound traffic is routed. In the UK your ISP will have a connection to the London Internet Exchange, or LINX (https://www.linx.net/).

I was chatting with the CTO and the network engineers at DE-CIX about their planning cycles and expansion plans and the impact fibre build-out will have on that. For those of you who don't know, the German telecom market differs to that of the UK in the number of large regional operators that exist - often spin outs from the utility companies who also operate in a regional manner. The BT equivalent in Germany is DT (Deutsche Telekom) and they seem to have a similar view to FTTH as BT. In other words nice to have, too expensive to justify but let's start with FTTC to a few carefully selected cabinets. Meanwhile there are some of the other operators in Germany (such as Net Cologne, Hansenet or Wilhelmtel) who are taking a more proactive stance and are rolling out FTTH services in their local urban areas. All of which, of course, will have a massive impact on DE-CIX.

Today they offer ISPs two basic services (or pipes if you prefer) - 1 Gig or 10Gig. The 1Gig is more popular although they can see demand starting to ramp up for 10G pretty quickly. At the moment traffic growth is linear rather than exponential, which is good for them and makes capacity planning a little easier but it is expected to change as FTTH roll out gathers pace. At that point demand could easily outstrip capacity. Not because of any technical reason, after all 100Gig ports are quickly becoming available on network equipment and DWDM (or dense wave division multiplexing - essentially using individual wavelengths in a light beam to carry separate data streams thereby vastly increasing the capacity of an individual fibre) gives them virtually unlimited capacity upstream. Not because of any reluctance to do so, after all high speed services come with a higher tariff and resulting in higher revenues.

The issue is twofold - firstly it is virtually impossible to predict the demand and therefore the requirements within their networks and secondly because upgrading their networks is not a trivial task. It takes a lot of time to test, certify and implement new technology in these networks and all of this must be done with no impact to their existing customers. In addition they have strict operational procedures (for example to upgrade a customer from a 1G service to a 10G service) and new technology means new procedures all of which adds to the time to implement.

The challenges faced by DE-CIX are very similar to other operators as well in terms of capacity planning (remember the Internet exchange is a fairly basic service when compared with the vast array of voice and data services offered by many) and it is worth remembering that there are many companies involved in the transit of your Internet requests all of whom are battling to keep their heads above the rising bandwidth tide as we demand and consume ever higher bandwidth in the access networks.

I'm not telling you this to generate sympathy for these groups - after all what business would not want to have such high demand for its products? I am saying we should accelerate the demand, increase the pressure! NGA must continue at pace, in fact it must accelerate! Remember NGN (Next Generation Networks) has been around for more than 10 years whereby operators are upgrading their core networks to cope with the massive surge in data traffic. We are told that the NGN brings virtually unlimited bandwidth (actually limited by the equipment on either end of the fibre and technology to deliver ever higher port speeds or wavelength capacities moves at a great pace) so let's do everything we can to fill those pipes. Let's be more creative with methods to deliver NGA. FTTH is the end-game without any doubt but let's look at more cost-effective ways we can utilise to stage our development towards the end-game.

Also, and perhaps most importantly, let's not let bureaucracy stand in our way (something I am currently facing!). Let's work to educate everyone to the benefits of NGA, let's ensure politicians understand how it will help them to help us and also how they can help remove the barriers that make it so difficult (for example property tax on fibre).

Let's work together to build The Fibre Generation!

Posted via email from Mark's posterous